Monday, March 21, 2016

Donald Trump's meeting with The Washington Post - March 21, 2016



By Philip Rucker and Robert Costa

Donald Trump outlined an unabashadly non interventionist approach to world affairs Monday, telling The Washington Post's editorial board that he questions the need for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which has formed the backbone of Western security policies since the Cold War. 
The meeting at The Post covered a range of issues, including media libel laws, violence at his rallies, climate change, the NATO and the U.S. presence in Asia. 

Read more:


  1. Mr. Trump scored big time today!

  2. After supporting neocons for years, I totally agree with Mr. Trump's nonintervention approach. It will save a lot money for the country. Also on trade, Trump is right, we need one-on-one deals so that no one can sneak around and take advantage of the pact.

    I have come a long way with Trump, from anti to whole-hearted support. I think Trump will have a very good chance to beat Hillary. The current national polls mean nothing. Only electoral college counts.


  3. :

    "Hooray For the Blacklist! Revelation "The Man" Was Either Lying Then or They're Lying Now" ...


  4. Donald Trump in the press conference discussed the incident that took place at Tucson (approximately 56:15 of ("Donald Trump Press Conference at The Old Post Office in DC (3-21-16)")). Among other things Trump mentioned, to his understanding, the supporter had a very fine record in the Air Force. This is an African American supporter who has a great family who was subjected to protester abuse.

    Donald Trump previously discussed the provocative situation against the Trump supporter ... and reiterated that violence is NOT condoned (approximately 15:20 of ("Donald Trump FULL Speech at Palm Beach County GOP Lincoln Day dinner (3-20-16)")).

    Also, in approximately 5:25 of ("Black cop tells the TRUTH about Trump rallies""Published on Mar 20, 2016") Officer Brandon Tatum apparently said that 'I don't know if he [the anti-Trump protester] spit on this guy [the Trump supporter (if he actually was a Trump supporter)] or hit him ... he assaulted someone and he lost the battle'; however, at - - it states "*I'd like to add that after further investigation the protester that was punched did not provoke the other male, according to authorities. I don't need to state the obvious regarding my stance on assault."


  5. An attempt to communicate with a fanatical #NeverTrump blogger : By the way, this blogger stated (in ) "Trump is an extremely dangerous man and so are his supporters".

    This reminds me of Top Gun - "I am dangerous" -

    Am I also blacklisted? I guess there's no where to go but up :-)


    - "#Arizona & #Utah: Don't forget to get out & vote for @realDonaldTrump! Together we can #MakeAmericaGreatAgain #VOTE"

    “Eric Trump On the Record Interview After Death Threats on Donald Trump - 3/21/16 - Fox News” -


  7. - "Trump thanks Latina supporter; now mounting backlash threatens her business". It’s also interesting that they are concerned that there may be rioting if the nomination is stolen. Notice they are not concerned about stealing the nomination – only about rioting. How concerned were they about rioting in Chicago? Some of us like to laugh it off, but when establishment "conservatives" say they want to blacklist us it doesn't sound very civil. What should we do? Failure is not an option. Are we playing too nice?